It takes experience to be able to do it with just discussion. P™ Taiwan 2010 Program Overview: An intensive training program based on theory and practice of ICA’s Technology of Participation™ methods, for those who wish to raise their core competency in group and individual processes. So you’ve read our thoughts, now we’d like to read yours! Eradicating Meningitis. A friend turns him on to ORID, a Technology of Participation (ToP) method used for focused conversations in meetings. There are currently no comments. Careful matching of student need to technology features is critical when selecting assistive technology for participation. Brian Stanfield R, (2008) The Art of Focused Conversation. ToP trainees come from all walks of life and are applying these simple, flexible methods to some of the world’s most complex challenges. The main essence is that this facilitation option, compared to the many other frameworks for facilitation, insists people consider all that is known (O) and their feelings (R) before considering issues and decisions, thereby ensuring the robustness of the issues (I) and decisions (D). This helps ensure a well rounded and robust outcome. Would love your thoughts, please comment. A particular type of case study used  to create a narrative of how institutional arrangements have evolved over time and have created and contributed to more effective ways to achieve project or program goals. If you want more, we recommend getting hold of Brian Stanfield’s book. About the Technology of Participation (ToP) Technology of Participation (ToP) is a powerful collection of structured facilitation methods that transform the way groups think, talk and work together. An approach used to surface, elaborate, and critically consider the options and implications of boundary judgments, that is, the ways in which people/groups decide what is relevant to what is being evaluated. I have read and I accept the terms of BetterEvaluation’s. A research design that focuses on understanding a unit (person, site or project) in its context, which can use a combination of qualitative and quantitative data. It contains a special set of methods that equips facilitators for very challenging work. A way to jointly develop an agreed narrative of how an innovation was developed, including key contributors and processes, to inform future innovation efforts. Define ethical and quality evaluation standards, Document management processes and agreements, Develop planning documents for the evaluation or M&E system, Develop programme theory / theory of change, activities, outcomes, impacts and context, Combine qualitative and quantitative data, Check the results are consistent with causal contribution, Investigate possible alternative explanations, Sustained and emerging impacts evaluation (SEIE), Technology and evaluation in insecure settings, Evaluation practice in Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander settings, https://newsociety.com/books/a/the-art-of-focused-conversation, 3. We are a global collaboration aimed at improving evaluation practice and theory through co-creation, curation, and sharing information. This is a great overview of ORID. She’s also used it to do a quick evaluation and get some feedback on how things were going with a project team. An ORID is best done with a facilitator who is trained in the technique. A few extra thoughts: ** Be careful about asking for ‘key’ or ‘most important’ stuff at the O level. This is to prompt action, or to help plan the next step. This process ensures we get more reliable results from the option. What were the most important facts in this session or report? We are all much more likely to act our way into a new way of thinking than to think our way into a new way of acting. What technology features are important to An impact evaluation approach without a control group that uses narrative causal statements elicited directly from intended project beneficiaries. A strengths-based approach designed to support ongoing learning and adaptation by identifying and investigating outlier examples of good practice and ways of increasing their frequency. For example, 'Randomized Controlled Trials' (RCTs) use a combination of the options random sampling, control group and standardised indicators and measures. An ORID can help close a workshop with purpose or provide some quick reflections or evaluate an activity. stands for the reflective questions. Investigate possible alternative explanations, 1. Many terms are used to describe these approaches, including real time evaluations, rapid feedback evaluation, rapid evaluation methods, rapid-cycle evaluation and rapid appraisal. A particular type of case study used to jointly develop an agreed narrative of how an innovation was developed, including key contributors and processes, to inform future innovation efforts. An impact evaluation approach that compares results between a randomly assigned control group and experimental group or groups to produce an estimate of the mean net impact of an intervention. (Again more an Interpretive question.) The approach I proposed drew on the methods of ICA’s Technology of Participation (ToP). Today we’re going to explore a quick and simple way to have a structured conversation about something, or anything really! Becoming a Facilitator of ICA’s Technology of Participation To. Becoming a Certified ToP Facilitator (CTF) is a journey that will deepen your facilitation practice, expand your offerings to clients, and hone your creative and intentional design skills. At a recent IAF meeting Martin gave his overview of the Focused Discussion method (ORID) developed by the ICA as part of their ‘Technology of Participation’. Secondly, any one who has a vested interest in the project or programme will should be playing the role of valued participant, not facilitator. The types of questions this option answers: Full list of advantages given on The Art of Focused Conversation (p21). These questions are about how we feel about the situation or the facts. And in the book there are many examples of using the technique in different situations. , and having a look at the resources below this post. The Technology of Participation is a constellation of life understandings and methods that value inclusive participation and profound respect in a wide variety of settings and applications. A real meeting of minds and action, I reckon! ** The examples of Interpretive questions are all good! This approach was developed by Robert Brinkerhoff to assess the impact of organisational interventions, such as training and coaching, though the use of SCM is not limited to this context. Seriously, stop for a moment and think about it. Secondly, any one who has a vested interest in the project or programme will should be playing the role of valued parti… Training Opportunities: Probably not necessary for commissioners to undertake full training in this option. It was developed by the Institute of Cultural Affairs (ICA) in Canada and involves a facilitator asking people four levels of questioning with each level building on previous levels. efault>TECHNOLOGY OF PARTICIPATION (ToP) Participation mattersToP methods are bringing high levels of participation to the decision-making process while embedding the ability to create specific customized applications.ToP cultivates the collective ideas that result in breakthrough changes and it generates the spirit of commitment that undergirds follow through. Develop planning documents for the evaluation or M&E system, 8. Review evaluation (do meta-evaluation), 2. At longer timeframes, you’d be nesting smaller loops inside. Enjoy a brief overview of two basic ToP methods - the Focused Conversation and Consensus Workshop - both taught as part of the ToP Facilitation Methods and ToP Facilitation Methods - Leadership Edition courses. This is to prompt action, or to help plan the next step. Spanning governing bodies, mass participation events, teams and individuals, new sports technology facilitating participation in sport emerges almost daily. Some examples are: What does this mean [for the organisation/community/person]? Describe the important STUDENT considerations when selecting assistive technology for participation. A quality ORID will be one where the transitions between the four stages is seamless and the participants are not aware of the rigour behind the facilitation. Approaches (on this site) refer to an integrated package of options (methods or processes). A strengths-based approach to learning and improvement that involves intended evaluation users in identifying ‘outliers’ – those with exceptionally good outcomes - and understanding how they have achieved these. Focused Conversation Structure (ORID) Template . Overview of ToP Focused Conversation and ToP Consensus Workshop Methods S. ORID step: perception targets An approach that focuses on assessing the value of an intervention as perceived by the (intended) beneficiaries, thereby aiming to give voice to their priorities and concerns. An impact evaluation approach suitable for retrospectively identifying emergent impacts by collecting evidence of what has changed  and, then, working backwards, determining whether and how an intervention has contributed to these changes. We don’t want this to be just a one-way conversation – join in by sharing your thoughts and ideas with us! Read it, Use prequestions and boost the learning from your videos. Pioneered and refined by ICA in over 50 years of experience worldwide, this is a proven system of methods and tools that can be adapted and applied to help all sorts of groups accomplish a … In general, many teachers have had difficulty integrating computer and software technologies into learning activities and classroom curricula because specific technologies are ill-suited to their needs, or they lack the ability to make effective use of these technologies.
Booze Cruise Negril Jamaica, Hey Siri On Mac Catalina, What Month Is 9 Months Before May, Sinner Saved By Grace, 1995 Tiara 4000 Express Specs, They Say, I Say Chapter 3 Templates, Ford Transit Medium Roof Height, Title 24 Window Film, How Fast Does Pothos Grow In Water, Ac Delco Uk, Admission To Discharge Flowchart, Pros And Cons Of Living In Kentucky Vs Tennessee,